white dot red dot blue dot green dot



Yancey A to Z

Festschrift in a New Key

B

Bitzer

References

the single Author is an artifice
--Vielstimmig, "Petals"

References

[1]A special thanks to the oddkin integral to this project. First, thanks to Drew Hudnall, PhD student in the Rhetoric and Composition Program at Florida State University who, through the auspices of the English Department’s Reading-Writing Center/Digital Studio, patiently introduced me to and guided me through use of Google sites. Second, much gratitude to Stephen McElroy who took that fledgling webtext and worked his magic in amazing ways to ensure the webtext matched this festschrift’s formatting and aesthetic. All virtues belong to these two oddkin. Its infelicities remain mine.

Thanks as well to oddin Stephen McElroy, Matthew Davis, and Rory Lee for their editorial patience, support, and critical feedback. Similarly, thanks to Kathleen Blake Yancey for responding so promptly and thoroughly to emails asking odd questions (“But where did everyone stand?”)

Finally, thanks to all the scholars who jockeyed for attention but ended up on the cutting room floor: Suzanne Langer, Gregory Bateson, Karma Chávez, Karen Burke LeFevre, bell hooks, Ann Berthoff, and Patricia Hill Collins among so many others.

Andersen, A. N., & Jacklyn, P. (1993). Termites of the Top End. CSIRO Publishing.

Anzaldúa, G. (1987). Borderlands/LaFrontera: The new mestiza. aunt lute books.

Akrasia25. (2019, November 24). Mixotricha paradoxa. [Illustration.] Wikimedia Commons. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mixotricha_paradoxa_color_and.png.

Benjamin, W. (1968). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In H. Arendt (Ed.), Illuminations: Essays and reflections (H. Zohn, Trans.) (pp. 217-251). Schocken Books.

Biesecker, B. A. (1989). Rethinking the rhetorical situation from within the thematic of différance. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 22 (2), 110-130. www.jstor.org/stable/40237580.

Bitzer, L. F. (1968). Rhetorical situation. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 1(1), 1-14. .  www.jstor.org/stable40236733.

Bitzer, L. F. (1980). Functional communication: A situational perspective. In E. F. White (Ed.), Rhetoric in transition: Studies in the nature and use of rhetoric (pp. 21-38). Pennsylvania State University Press.

Bradotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity.

Brightsmith, D. J. (2005). Competition, predation and nest niche shifts among tropical cavity nesters: Ecological evidence. Journal of Avian Biology, 36(1), https://org.10.1111/j.0908-8857.2005.03311.x.

Brinton, A. (1981). Situation in the theory of rhetoric. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 14(4), 234-248. www.jstor.org/stable/40237296.

Bronstein, Judith L. (2015). The Study of mutualism. In J. L. Bronstein (Ed.), Mutualism (online ed.) (3-19). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/97801996754.003.0001.

Browdy, R. (2021). Black women’s rhetoric(s): A conversation starter for naming and claiming a field of study. Peitho, 23(4). https://cfshrc.org/article/black-womens-rhetorics-a-conversation-starter-for-naming-and-claiming-a-field-of-study/.

Burke, K. (1969a).  A Grammar of motives. University of California Press.

Burke, K. (1969b). A Rhetoric of motives. University of California Press.

Cabrils. (2020, October 21). An Australian kookaburra co-opts a tree termite nest [Photograph]. Wikimedia Commons. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kookaburra-making-hollow-in-arboreal-termite-nest_4.jpg

Collins, V. T. (1999). The speaker respoken. College English, 61(5), 545-573. Jstor.org/stable/378973.

Consigny, S. (1974). Rhetoric and Its situations. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 7(3), 175-186. www.jstor.org/stable/40237197.

CSIRO. (2007, March 6). M. darwiniensis worker termites [Photograph]. Wikimedia Commons. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CSIRO_ScienceImage_3976_Mastotermes_darwiniensis_Giant_Northern_Termite.jpg.

CSIRO ScienceImage. (2007, March 6). A giant northern termite crafts a mound [Photograph]. Wikimedia Commons. https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=35479115.

Douglas, A. (2015). The special case of symbioses: Mutualisms with persistent contact. In J. L. Bronstein (Ed.), Mutualism (online ed.) (20-34). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199675654.003.0002.

Drady, Gayle. (nd). N. walkeri worker termites [Photograph]. Creative Commons. https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/151193477.

Eco, U. (1995 June 22). Ur-fascism. The New York Review of Books. https://www-nybooks-com.eu1.proxy.openathens.net/articles/1995/06/22/ur-fascism/.

Edbauer, J. (2005). Unframing models of public distribution: From rhetorical situation to rhetorical ecologies. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 35(4), 5-24. Doi.org/10.1080/02773940509391320.

Ervin, E. (2006). Rhetorical situations and the straits of inappropriateness: Teaching feminist activism. Rhetoric Review, 25(3), 316-333. doi.org/10.1207/s1532798l42503_5.

Foucault, M. (1983). Preface. In G. Deleuze & F. Guarttari, Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia, (R.Hurley, M. Seem, & H. R. Lane, Trans., pp. xi-xvi). University of Missouri Press.

Garret, M., & Xiao, X. (1993). The rhetorical situation revisited. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 23(2), pp. 30-40. Doi.org/10.1080/02773949309985.

Gilyard, K., & Banks, A. J. (2018). On African-American rhetoric. Routledge Press.

Giraud, E. H. (2019). What comes after entanglement?: Activism, anthropocentrism, and an ethics of exclusion. Duke University Press.

Hadfield, M. C., & Haraway, D. J. (2019). The tree snail manifesto. Current Anthropology, 60(20), S209-235. Doi: 10.1086/703377.

Haraway, D. J. (1993). Companion species manifesto: Dogs, people, and Significant otherness. Prickly Paradigm Press.

Haraway, D. J. (1997). Modest_witness@second-millennium.femaleman©_meets_oncomouse™: Feminism and technoscience. Routledge Press, 1997.

Haraway, D. J. (2000). How like a leaf: In interview with Thyrza Nichols Goodeve. Routledge Press, 2000.

Haraway, D. J. (2008). When species meet. University of Minnesota Press.

Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the chthulucene. Duke University Press.

Haraway, D. J. (2018). Nothing comes without its world: Conversation with Thyrza Nichols Goodeve, 20th anniversary of Modest_Witness. In Haraway, D. J., Modest_witness@second-millennium.femaleman©_meets_oncomouse™: Feminism and technoscience (2nd ed, pp. xiii-xlvii). Routledge Press.

Hauser, G. A., & Kjeldsen, J. E. (2010). Rhetorical situations in everyday discourse. African Yearbook of Rhetoric, 1(1), 91-100.  Https://journals.co.za/doi/abs/10.10520/EJC169585.

Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. The University of Chicago Press.

Hindwood, K. A. (1959). The nesting of birds in the nests of social insects. The Emu, 59(1), 1-36. Doi:10.1071/MU959001.

Hunkeler, T. (2022). Parisian rivalries before the war: Futurism and cubism as enemy brothers (1912-1914). International Yearbook of Futurism Studies, 12, 93-122. Https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110800920.

Hyde, Michael. (2011). Ethics, rhetoric, and discourse. In Cheney, G, May, S., & Munshi, D. (Eds.), The handbook of communication ethics (pp. 31-44). Routledge Press. search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=e000xna&AN=346308&site=ehost-live.

Kirsch, G. (1997). Multi-Vocal texts and interpretive responsibility. College English, 49(2), 191-201. Jstor.org/stable/378548.

Kutay, C., & Walsh, S. (2021). Story learning practices as innovation for life-long learning.” Om Chova-Gómez, L., & Candel. I. T. (Eds.), 14th international conference of education, research, and innovation (pp. 8366-8373, IATED Academy.  Doi: 10.21125/iceri.2021.1922.

Lawford, E. (2015, June 23). Daleks, Santa Claus, nude women: Northern Territory’s costumed termite mounds become art subject. ABC News.  https://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-06-23/daleks-santa-nude-women-nt-termite-mounds-become-artwork/6567042.

Lu, M. (1999). Redefining the literate self: The politics of critical affirmation. College Composition and Communication, 51(2), 172-194.

Mark, S. (2019). ‘Creation and action’: Ezra Pound and Italian Futurism. In Preda, R. (Ed.), The Edinburgh companion to Ezra Pound and the arts (pp. 247-259). Edinburgh University Press. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=e000xna&AN=2409616&site=ehost-live.

Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of living. D. Reidel Press.

McGee, M. C. (1982). A materialist’s conception of rhetoric.” In McKerrow, R. (Ed.), Exploration in rhetoric: Studies in honor of Douglas Ehninger (pp. 23-48). Scott, Foreman Press.

McPherson, John Robert. (2017, February 2). Adolescent kookaburra in termite nest [Photograph]. Wikimedia Commons. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Laughing_kookaburra_juvenile_in_nest_7th_Brigade_Park_Chermside_P1450457.jpg

Miller, A. B. (1972). Rhetorical exigence. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 5(2), 111-118.  Jstor.org/stable/40236794.

Morgans, J. (2018, Sept. 11). Australians think it’s very funny to put clothes on termites.” Vice.  https://www.vice.com/en/article/australians-think-its-very-funny-to-put-clothes-on-termite-mounds/.

Mosse, G. L. (1990). The political culture of Italian Futurism: A general perspective. Journal of Contemporary History, 25(2/3), 253-268. http://www.jstor.org/stable/260732

Patton, J. H. (1979). Causation and creativity in rhetorical situation: Distinctions and implications. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 65(1), 35-55. Doi.10.1080/00335637909383457.

Pickering-Iazzi, R. (1997). Politics of the visible: Writing women, culture, and fascism. University of Minnesota Press.

Pound, E. (1913). In a station of the metro. Poetry: A Magazine of Verse, 2(1), 12.  https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=hvd.32044005028659&seq=1.

Price-Williams, D., & Gaines, R. (1994). The dreamtime and dreams of northern Australian Aboriginal artists. Ethos, 22(3), 373-388. https://www.jstor.org/stable/640405.

Rosenblatt. L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Southern Illinois University Press.

Schmid, U. (2005). Style versus ideology: Towards a conceptualisation of fascist aesthetics. Totalitarian movements and political religions, 6(1), 127-140. doi: 10.1080/146907605001110247.

Si, A., & Turpin, M. (2015). The importance of insects in Australian Aboriginal society: A dictionary survey.” Ethnobiology Letters, 6(1), 175-182. www.jstor.org/stable/26423615.

Smith, C. (2019a). Northern Territory ‘snowmen.’ [Photographs]. Private collection. Finders University, Adelaide, Australia.

Smith, C. (2019, November 18b). What the termite mound ‘snowmen’ of the NT can tell us about human nature. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/what-the-termite-mound-snowmen-of-the-nt-can-tell-us-about-human-nature-122038.

Spooner, M., & Yancey, K. (1996). Postings on a genre of email. College Composition and Communication, 47(2), 252-278. www.jstor.org/stable/359795.

Taczak, K., & Yancey, K. B. (2015). Threshold concept in rhetoric and composition doctoral education: The delivered, lived, and experienced curricula. In Adler-Kassner, L., & Wardle, E. (Eds.), Naming what we know: Threshold concepts in writing studies (pp. 140-154). University Press of Colorado. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt15nmjt7.17.

Thiele, K. (2019, May 19). What on Earth is Mixotricha paradoxa doing? Taxonomy Australiahttps://www.taxonomyaustralia.org.au/post/what-on-earth-is-mixotricha-paradoxa-doing.

Trinh, M. T. (1989). Woman, native, other: Writing postcoloniality and feminism. Indiana University Press.

Tuma, J., Eggleton, P., & Fayle, T. M. (2020). Ant-termite interactions: An important but under-explored ecological linkage. Biological Reviews, 95, 555-572. 10.1111/brv.12577.

van Huis, A. (2017). Cultural significance of termites in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 13(8), 1-12.  dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13002-017-0137-z.

Vatz, R. E. (1973). The myth of the rhetorical situation. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 6(3), 154-161.  https://www.jstor.org/stable/40236848.

Vatz, R. E. (2009). The mythical status of situational rhetoric: Implications for fhetorical critics’ relevance in the public arena. The Review of Communication, 9(1), 1-5. doi: 10.1080/15358590802020798.

Vielstimmig, M. (1998). Not a cosmic convergence: Rhetoric, poetics, performance, and the web. Kairos, 3(2). https://kairos.technorhetoric.net/3.2/features/myka/cosmic1.htm.

Vielstimmig, M. (1999). Petals on a wet, black bough: Textuality, collaboration, and the new essay. In Hawisher, G., & Selfe, Cynthia (Eds.), Passions, Pedagogies and 21st Century Technologies (pp. 89-114). Utah State University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt46nrfk.8.

Vielstimmig, M. (2001). A play on texts: Rhetorics and poetics of discourse. In Barber, J. F., & Grigar, D. (Eds.), New words, new worlds: Exploring pathways for writing about and In electronic environments (pp. 121-143). Hampton Press.

Waits, T., & Midler, B. (1977). I Never Talk to Strangers [Song]. On Foreign affairs [Album]. Asylum Records.

Wiesser, K. G. (2017). Back to the blanket: Recovered rhetorics and literacies in American Indian Studies. University of Oklahoma Press.

Yancey, K. B. (1983). Scripts, Schemas, and Scribes: Needed Dimensions of the Composing Process [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Purdue University.

Yancey, K. B. (1992). Still hopeful after all these years: Teachers as agents of change. Language Arts Journal of Michigan, 8(1), 84-90. Doi.org/10.9707/2168-149X.1624.

Yancey, K. B. (2004). Made not only in words: Composition in a new key.” College Composition and Communication, 56(2), 297-328. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4140651.

Yancey, K. B. (2010a). New beginnings. College Composition and Communication, 61(3), 408-409.

Yancey, K. B. (2010b). Rhetorical situation: Poster page.” College Composition and Communication, 61(2), 611.

Yancey, K. B. (2011a). From the editor: Writing agency, writing practices, writing pasts and futures. College Composition and Communication, 62(3), 416-19. https://www.jstor.org/stable/i27917904.

Yancey, K. B. (2011b). Portfolios, learning, and agency: Promises, perceptions, possibilities. JAC, 31(3/4), 717-36. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41709668.

Yancey, K. B. (2012). The rhetorical situation of writing assessment: Exigence, location, and the making of knowledge.” In Elliot, N., & Perelman, L. (Eds.), Writing assessment in the 21st century: Essays in honor of Edward M. White (475-495). Hampton Press.

Yancey, K. B. (2017). In memoriam: Lloyd Bitzer (1931-2016). WPA: Writing Program Administration, 40(2), 12-14.

Yancey, K. B. (2019). Trust the process. In Gallagher, J. R., & DeVoss, D. N. (Eds.), Explanation points: Publishing in rhetoric and composition (pp. 96-99). Utah State University Press. Doi.org/10.7330/9781607328834.

Yancey, K. B. (2021). A Study of making-ness: Texts, memory, and art. In Goggin, M. D., & Rose, S. K. (Eds.), Women’s ways of making (pp. 162-176). University Press of Colorado. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv1kz4gmg.14.

Yancey, K. B. (2022). ‘Seizing’ Kairos: Never again MSD’s enactment of (digital) rhetoric. Enculturation: A Journal of Rhetoric, Writing, and Culture, 33. https://enculturation.net/seizing_kairos.

Yancey, K. B. (2023). Interview with Kathleen Blake Yancey on rhetorical situation [video]. YouTube.

Yancey, K. B. (2025, February 1). The things you learn in a pandemic: Note 1317 [Facebook post]. Facebook. (20+) Facebook

Yancey, K. B., & Spooner, M. (1994). Concluding the text: Notes toward a theory and the practice of voice. In Yancey, K. B. (Ed.), Voices on voice: Perspectives, definitions, inquiry (pp. 298-314). National Council of Teachers of English.

Yancey, K. B., & Spooner, M. (1998). A single good mind: Collaboration, cooperation, and the writing self. College Composition and Communication, 49(1), 45-62. https://www.jstor.org/stable/358559

Yancey, K. B., & McElroy, S. J. (2017). Assembling composition: An introduction.” In Yancey, K. B., & McElroy, S. J. (Eds.), Assembling Composition (pp. 2-25). National Council of Teachers of English.

Young, M. J. (2001). Lloyd F. Bitzer: Rhetorical situation, public knowledge, and audience dynamics. In Kuypers, J. A., & King, A. (Eds.), Twentieth-Century roots of rhetorical studies (pp. 275-302). Bloomsbury Press.

Zournazi, M. (2003). Hope: New philosophies for change. Routledge Press.

termite-icon
Introducing... (Un)Conventional Beginnings Three Sympoietic Rhetorical Properties